Skjemaet har blitt sendt inn.
Mer informasjon finner du i postkassen din.
If you’re here, chances are your monolithic system is becoming more of a burden than an asset. Slow release cycles, scaling headaches, and a rigid architecture make it harder to keep up. The bigger your app gets, the more frustrating it becomes. New tech doesn’t integrate smoothly, agility takes a hit, and reliability starts slipping.
Microservices can turn things around by making your system modular, speeding up deployments, and letting you scale exactly what you need when you need it. But here’s the catch: migrating isn’t just about splitting code. If you don’t plan it right, you could end up with more complexity, integration nightmares, and unexpected costs.
In this article, I’ll walk you through a real-world roadmap for moving from monolith to microservices. No fluff — just practical steps, hard-earned lessons from our solution architects, and strategies that actually work. Let’s dive in.
I’ve seen many companies think microservices are the magic fix, only to end up with more complexity, broken workflows, and skyrocketing costs. And if there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s that jumping straight into the tech side without a solid plan is a fast track to chaos.
It’s tempting to start ripping apart a monolith and spinning up services, but before we even touch the code, we work with clients to map out the why, when, and how of migration. That way, every step forward actually delivers value.
Whenever clients come to us about switching from monolith to microservices, I ask what’s driving their decision to move. The answers vary, but more often than not, I hear, because their competitors are doing so. And honestly, that’s not a great reason. Jumping into microservices without a clear goal usually just leads to more headaches, not actual progress.
So before taking the plunge, ask yourself:
If you’re not 100% sure — no worries. We’ll help you define the key metrics and business outcomes upfront, so every tech decision moves the needle.
Microservices bring modularity, independent scaling, and faster innovation. But they’re not a silver bullet. Some businesses do just fine with a monolith, especially if their app is simple, stable, and not changing much.
Imagine a small employee portal or an inventory system that only a handful of people use. If it’s working fine and doesn’t need constant updates, breaking it into microservices could just add a bunch of complexity for no real gain.
That’s why we don’t push microservices just for the sake of it. Instead, we look at what you specifically need and whether microservices will bring real rewards. If they will, great — we go for it. If not, we find a better way forward.
Once we’ve decided microservices are the right move, we like to give your system a full health check to see how everything’s connected. We look for slow spots, potential dependency issues, and where all that critical data lives.
Skipping this step is risky. If you don’t know what’s under the hood, you could accidentally knock over the whole system like dominos. By mapping out what’s working, what’s lagging, and what could break, we create a smart migration plan that tackles the most critical areas first, minimizing risks, avoiding downtime, and making the transition as smooth as possible.
By now, you’ve probably guessed, I’m not a fan of tearing down an entire monolith overnight. It’s too risky, too disruptive, and usually not worth the stress. Instead, I opt for a step-by-step approach that gives you quick wins while keeping your operations stable.
One of my favorite strategies is the Strangler Fig pattern, which lets your old system and new microservices coexist until you’re ready for the full handover.
Branch by Abstraction is handy when you have to make changes inside the monolith itself: we add a layer, move components one by one, and retire the old stuff without blowing things up.
If reliability is mission-critical, Parallel Run keeps both systems going, comparing outputs before you fully commit.
And if you can’t mess with the monolith, Change Data Capture lets us track database changes to keep microservices in sync.
There’s no single best method — it all depends on your setup. Our team also picks which parts to migrate first, focusing on the ones that’ll have the biggest impact. Take an e-commerce checkout system handling thousands of daily orders or a data analytics engine that constantly updates — those should go early. That way, you see real benefits fast and keep your operations sane.
Incorporation of microservices also means shaking up how your teams work. Instead of one huge team handling a monolith, I suggest moving to smaller, cross-functional teams where each one owns a specific microservice. This way, decisions get made faster, and everyone knows exactly what they’re responsible for.
Additionally, our experts bring in DevOps principles and automation from day one so that rolling out new features is smooth and hassle-free.
“Switching from monolith to microservices isn’t just a tech tweak — it hits your development speed, system stability, and your ability to scale. Without a best-laid plan, costs can skyrocket and integrations can turn into a real headache. At Innowise, we make the transition smooth and efficient, so you can keep things agile and focus on growing your business.”
Dmitry Nazarevich
CTO
Once we’ve mapped out the migration strategy, the next big question is figuring out how to break monolith into microservices without making a mess. I’ve seen companies either try to decouple everything at once or just pick random modules to split out. Either way, it leads to wasted time, broken dependencies, and months of frustrating rework.
My rule of thumb: keep it business-focused. That means each microservice should map to a real business function, not just some random chunk of code.
One of the common pitfalls we see is splitting a monolith into technical layers. I mean separating the frontend, backend, and database into different services. That’s a surefire way to end up with tightly coupled, overly chatty microservices that don’t scale well. Instead, we go with Domain-Driven Design (DDD) and bounded contexts to break things down in a way that actually makes sense.
Take an e-commerce platform. Rather than splitting it into a generic front-end service and back-end service, we separate it into real business functions like order processing, inventory management, payments, and user management. Each service owns its own logic and data, keeping them loosely coupled so they can scale independently and evolve without breaking everything else.
I’m not a fan of the “big bang” approach. Trying to migrate everything at once is just asking for trouble. Instead, we focus on what to break off first by looking at:
This approach helps us score quick wins and show early value, making it easier to get buy-in from the team. For example, in an enterprise HR system, payroll processing might make a great microservice since it handles complex, region-specific calculations. But a static company directory? Probably isn’t worth the extra overhead and can stay in the monolith for a while.
The last thing we want is to convert monolith to microservices and still end up with a bunch of services that depend too much on each other. To dodge this, we:
By keeping services loosely coupled, we can upgrade or modify them without worrying about breaking everything else.
As I said before, microservices really shine when each team owns their service from start to finish. You get quicker feedback, more accountability, and way less back-and-forth between teams. At Innowise, we help companies set up their teams so devs, ops, QA, and everyone else can work together smoothly.
After we’ve split your monolith into microservices, the first question is usually what do we do with the data? In a monolithic setup, everything’s tied to one big database, which works until it doesn’t. In a microservices setup, that shared database quickly becomes a bottleneck, slowing everything down and making it impossible to scale services independently.
That’s why I push for a decentralized data model, where each microservice owns its own data. Done right, it lets each service grow, adapt, and scale without constantly tripping over each other.
A massive, all-in-one database might seem like the easy way to go, but in a microservices setup, it quickly turns into a bottleneck. Every service has different needs, and cramming everything into a single database just creates roadblocks. Scaling gets tricky, dependencies pile up, and even small changes can cause system-wide issues.
That’s why we split up into smaller, service-specific ones, so each microservice:
This way, everything is more flexible, keeps teams from stepping on each other’s toes, and avoids the database bottleneck that slows everyone down.
Moving data out of a monolith isn’t a flip-the-switch moment. A rip-the-bandage-off migration is risky, so I prefer an incremental approach, breaking it down step by step.
Usually, that means spinning up new tables or databases for each microservice and keeping them in sync with the old system using Change Data Capture (CDC) or dual writes. That way, each service gradually takes ownership of its data — no downtime, no unpleasant surprises.
In a monolith, you’ve got one big shared database and ACID transactions that make sure everything updates (or fails) together. But with microservices, every service manages its own data, so updates don’t happen instantly across the system.
Instead of direct updates, services talk through asynchronous messaging. Say an order is placed, the Order Service fires off an event, and the Inventory Service listens in to adjust stock. This setup keeps things running smoothly, even if a service temporarily goes down.
Of course, that means handling consistency the smart way. At Innowise, we use idempotent operations to prevent duplicates, retry mechanisms to handle hiccups, and dead-letter queues to catch failures. This way, your data stays accurate, even when things don’t go as planned.
Alright, now that we’ve set clear service boundaries and a solid data migration plan, it’s time to roll up our sleeves and turn strategy into action. Let’s dive into how we make that happen.
Our dev team builds microservices using modern tools like Spring Boot and Node.js, making sure they’re built to scale and handle real-world challenges. To keep things running smoothly, we use smart design patterns like circuit breakers to manage traffic spikes and graceful degradation to prevent cascading failures. That way, even if one service hits a snag, the rest of your system keeps running without a hitch.
Shutting down your monolith overnight? Not happening. Instead, we set up integration layers using RESTful APIs and message brokers like RabbitMQ or Apache Kafka to keep your new microservices and existing systems in sync. These act as bridges that let everything communicate smoothly without breaking workflows.
And when it makes sense, we also bring in API gateways to boost and secure interactions, guaranteeing a smooth transition with zero downtime.
We containerize your microservices with Docker so they’re fast, flexible, and easy to manage. With Kubernetes handling the orchestration, scaling up during busy times or rolling out updates across different environments is a snap. This setup keeps everything consistent, predictable, and cost-effective, so your IT ops never feel like a crapshoot.
Our team set up CI/CD pipelines with tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI, or CircleCI to handle testing, building, and deployments automatically. No more manual updates or last-minute fire drills. Bugs get caught early, releases go out faster, and the system stays rock solid.
Without the right safeguards, even the best-designed system can hit bottlenecks, unexpected failures, or just flat-out crash at the worst time. That’s why our team takes a no-shortcuts approach, automating everything and catching issues before they cause real problems.
Testing isn’t just the final step, it’s part of the entire process. Our AQA team uses multi-layered automated test suites to catch failures early, so nothing slips through the cracks.
Nobody wants a bad release bringing down their system, frustrating users, or tanking revenue. That’s why our team keeps deployments safe, controlled, and rollback-ready with battle-tested strategies.
Let’s say a retail company wants to launch a points-based loyalty program, but their order system is too complex to modify safely. A retail company wants to launch a points-based loyalty program, but its order system is too complex to modify safely. To play it safe, we test it with a small group first. If all goes well, we roll it out wider.
Once we’re confident the green version is solid, we flip traffic over instantly. If anything goes sideways, we switch back to blue. Zero downtime, no stress.
For instance, a travel platform wants to add real-time pricing, but messing with its old system could wreck booking. Instead of going all in, our team goes blue-green, sending a small group of users to the new setup first. If all’s good, we switch everyone over. If things go sideways, we roll back instantly.
Imagine an e-commerce company rolling out an AI-powered recommendation engine. Instead of flipping the switch for everyone, we use Feature Flags to enable it for returning customers first. If engagement and sales go up, we expand; if not, we turn it off instantly.
At the same time, our team runs A/B tests, comparing the old system to the new one and tracking key metrics like cart value and conversion rates. This data helps us fine-tune the AI before a full-scale launch.
Microservices churn out tons of data, so keeping an eye on system health in real time is a must. Our team sets up multi-layered monitoring with tools like Prometheus, Grafana, and New Relic to track speed, memory usage, and errors. This way, we can spot problems before they become a headache. Using ELK Stack, Fluentd, and others, we also gather all the logs (basically, the digital trail of your apps) in one place, so nothing slips by. And if something does go wrong, automated alerts get our engineers on it ASAP.
Let’s be real, no system is 100% fail-proof. Hardware dies, software crashes and cyber threats never stop evolving. That’s why data protection is a must. So our team sets up automated backup strategies so your critical data stays safe and easy to recover.
Migrating monolith to microservices isn’t just a one-time upgrade, they need ongoing care to perform at their best. We’re here for the long run, guaranteeing your setup stays agile, scales smoothly, and handles even the toughest loads.
Our team keeps an eye on each microservice, tweaking code, optimizing database queries, and smoothing out how services communicate to keep everything running fast.
By analyzing real-time traffic and load patterns, our specialists dynamically adjust resources, making sure high-demand services get the boost they need without overspending.
Your system needs to grow with your business. Our team tracks performance in real time, listens to feedback, and makes smart tweaks to keep your architecture secure, efficient, and bulletproof.
As we refine and expand your microservices, we keep everything well-documented. That way, future updates and migrations are smooth, and your team knows exactly what’s going on.
Monolith to microservices migration is a strategic move for better agility, scalability, and resilience. But jump in without a sensible plan, and you’re looking at downtime, broken workflows, and skyrocketing costs. A smart migration requires nailing service boundaries, handling data right, and following best practices for security and deployment.
At Innowise, we help companies make this shift with confidence. With 18+ years in software modernization and development, we handle everything from assessing your setup and designing a solid migration strategy to building scalable microservices and revamping performance. Our solution architects, DevOps engineers, and developers use tried-and-tested methods to reduce risk and maximize impact, guaranteeing your app’s systems scale and evolve with your business.
Bestill en samtale eller fyll ut skjemaet nedenfor, så kontakter vi deg så snart vi har behandlet forespørselen din.
Hvorfor Innowise?
2200+
IT-fagfolk
tilbakevendende kunder
18+
mange års ekspertise
1300+
vellykkede prosjekter
Bli den første til å få vite om IT-innovasjoner og interessante casestudier.
Ved å registrere deg godtar du våre Brukervilkår og Personvernerklæring, inkludert bruk av informasjonskapsler og overføring av personopplysninger.
© 2007-2025 Innowise. Alle rettigheter forbeholdt.
Personvernerklæring. Retningslinjer for informasjonskapsler.
Innowise Sp. z o.o Ul. Rondo Ignacego Daszyńskiego, 2B-22P, 00-843 Warszawa, Polen
Ved å registrere deg godtar du vår Retningslinjer for personvern, inkludert bruk av informasjonskapsler og overføring av dine personopplysninger.
Takk skal du ha!
Meldingen din er sendt.
Vi behandler forespørselen din og kontakter deg så snart som mulig.
Takk skal du ha!
Meldingen din er sendt.
Vi behandler forespørselen din og kontakter deg så snart som mulig.